I shot a Canon 5DII in raw for three years & posted a lot of my work on the web. I did PP on the image with a calibrated monitor. I would make initial adjustments in LR4 & further develop the raw file in PS. When generating a copy to post on the web, I would convert to sRGB & imbed the color profile when generating the web-ready jpg file. The image was slightly different when viewing in Firefox (it reads the embedded color profile) vs. viewing in Internet Explorer or Google Chrome browsers. But it was not a significant difference.
With my new 5DIII, when using the same PP methods & conversion, there is a huge difference depending on the browser. Firefox renders just a bit flat, but generally in the ball park of what I set the image color at. In IE & Chrome, the reds are really over saturated & the blues are somewhat so. I'm embarrassed to post anything with the fear that someone will look at them with one of those two browsers.
Has anyone else run into this issue when upgrading to the 5D3? Way over-saturated colors in certain browsers for sRGB jpg files?
Here's an example I posted on the Nature Photographer's Network site: http://www.naturephotographers.net/imagecritique/largephoto.cgi?ref=19 5761&w=i
If you view it in different browsers, you'll see the big difference. Thanks for any help or advice.